Re: Using C as a back end

gneuner@dyn.com (George Neuner)
4 Nov 2000 01:46:29 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[25 earlier articles]
Re: Using C as a back end kst@cts.com (Keith Thompson) (2000-11-01)
Re: Using C as a back end rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-11-01)
Re: Using C as a back end rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-11-01)
Re: Using C as a back end vbdis@aol.com (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end thp@roam-thp2.cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end gneuner@dyn.com (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-11-05)
Re: Using C as a back end freitag@alancoxonachip.com (Andi Kleen) (2000-11-05)
Re: Using C as a back end christl@rosalind.fmi.uni-passau.de (2000-11-05)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: gneuner@dyn.com (George Neuner)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 Nov 2000 01:46:29 -0500
Organization: Dynamic ReSolutions, Inc.
References: 00-10-148 00-10-174 00-10-182
Keywords: C, optimize
Posted-Date: 04 Nov 2000 01:46:28 EST

On 23 Oct 2000 21:59:42 -0400, sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (Steve Meyer)
wrote:


>But it turns out most statements in Verilog are independent so
>optimizer does not really need to look for basic blocks across Verilog
>statement boundaries. Is there a way to tell C compiler optimizer
>about this property? I have tried surrouding C statements with extra
>level block ({}) with no declarations but it does ont seem to help.
>Breaking long sections into multiple procedures seems to be even worse
>because there are many context C variables needed in Verilog execution
>so procudural call over head slows down exection speed.


Curly braces are only scoping clues. Blocks end whenever there is a
branch in the code - you might try tricking the compiler by something
like the following:


A: <code for verilog statement>
        goto B;
B: <code for verilog statement>
        goto C:
C: ...


It looks stupid, but the compiler might take the hint. Hopefully the
useless jumps would be eliminated by the optimizer.




Another way would be to bundle all the state variables into a
structure and generate a separate, one parameter function for each
verilog statement which explicitly tail calls the next function. Also
sounds stupid, but GCC will *sometimes* understand this and optimize
the function calls away.


Your mileage may vary.


George Neuner
Dynamic Resolutions, Inc.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.