|RegExp: EBNF or POSIX notation? firstname.lastname@example.org (Markus Dreyer) (2002-01-24)|
|Re: RegExp: EBNF or POSIX notation? email@example.com (=?ISO-8859-15?q?=22Cass=E9=.Hugues@free.fr) (2002-02-06)|
|Date:||6 Feb 2002 23:38:19 -0500|
|Organization:||Guest of ProXad - France|
|Posted-Date:||06 Feb 2002 23:38:19 EST|
I think your question is a little missy. EBNF and regular expressions
does not covers the same set of expressiveness. EBNF is a super-set
for regular expression extending them to context recording. Usually,
EBNF is used for languages with words which requires such a kind of
complexity, that is parsing. Regular expressions are more used for
lexing for representing words in classical compilation. Yet, this is
just my point of view.
"Markus Dreyer" <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :
> I have implemented a grammar using regular expressions. Now I am
> describing the ideas and the implementation in an academic paper.
> Which notation should I use to describe my regular expressions? Is EBNF
> (ISO 14977) okay? Or shall I use the POSIX notation? Or another?
> Thanks. Markus.
> [I don't think it matters much unless the professor for whom you're
> writing has strong religious views on the topic. -John]
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.