Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish

"Nerd" <nerd@freeuk.com>
31 Oct 1999 23:59:42 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Precedence values for Reverse Polish nerd@freeuk.com (Nerd) (1999-10-27)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (1999-10-29)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish lex@cc.gatech.edu (1999-10-31)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish ppaatt@aol.com (1999-10-31)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish nerd@freeuk.com (Nerd) (1999-10-31)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1999-11-02)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish ppaatt@aol.com (1999-11-02)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1999-11-03)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish ppaatt@aol.com (1999-11-05)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1999-11-18)
Re: Precedence values for Reverse Polish world!bobduff@uunet.uu.net (Robert A Duff) (1999-11-25)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Nerd" <nerd@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Oct 1999 23:59:42 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 99-10-124 99-10-190
Keywords: parse

Well actually it's a compiler not an interpreter, so I can backpatch it.


Actually, since I wrote that first message I've already got
"BEGIN...END" compound statements, and a full structure of the "IF"
that I wrote. It doesn't quite work, but it's getting there.


On the subject of compilers, what kind of simple optimisation could I
get it to do? It outputs assembly code for me to optimise anyway, so
only simple, easy stuff (efficient use of registers, etc...) is needed
because I do a lot by hand (although you may well ask why have a
compiler in the first place!!!)


--
Paul Evans


Paul_Evans@denbigh.net (school)
nerd@freeuk.com (home)
ICQ number: 4135350
<lex@cc.gatech.edu> wrote in message news:99-10-190@comp.compilers...
> [ various RPN tricks ]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.