Re: TenDRA

Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett)
29 Oct 1999 02:31:27 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
TenDRA luc.tanguay@bell.ca (TANGUAY, LUC) (1998-02-14)
Re: TenDRA fabre@gr.osf.org (Christian Fabre) (1998-02-18)
Re: TenDRA rca@rivers.dra.hmg.gb (Robert Andrews) (1998-02-18)
TenDRA foskaty@my-deja.com (Ole Foskaty) (1999-10-27)
Re: TenDRA andyj@mc.com (Andy Johnson) (1999-10-28)
Re: TenDRA Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (1999-10-29)
Re: TenDRA broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk (Mark Brown) (1999-10-31)
Re: TenDRA bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk (Bruce Stephens) (1999-10-31)
Re: TenDRA bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk (Bruce Stephens) (1999-11-01)
Re: TenDRA andyj@mc.com (Andy Johnson) (1999-11-02)
Re: TenDRA olafs@my-deja.com (Olaf Stoyke) (1999-11-02)
Re: TenDRA fbp@stlport.org (1999-11-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 29 Oct 1999 02:31:27 -0400
Organization: Natron Software Maintenance Ltd
References: 99-10-125 99-10-145
Keywords: UNCOL

"Andy Johnson" <andyj@mc.com> writes:
> It is really quite elegant. Unfortunately, elegant
> and/or superior technology is not always the winner in today's market,
> and TenDRA was never commercially successful, despite several attempts
> to make it so.


When we discussed with the DRA their licencing terms for using the
ANDF technology in our compilers, the charges they proposed were
breathtaking. This would have been 4 or 5 years ago.
--
Roger Barnett

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.