Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology

Joerg Brunsmann <joerg.brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de>
11 Oct 1999 02:38:43 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
maturity of the c++ compiler technology Vincenzo.DeFlorio@esat.kuleuven.ac.be (Vincenzo De Florio) (1999-10-04)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology ian@five-d.com (1999-10-06)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology jkahrs@castor.atlas.de (Juergen Kahrs) (1999-10-06)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology paul@toilet.dera.gov.uk (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology jandk@easynet.co.uk (Jonathan Barker) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology per@bothner.com (Per Bothner) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology joerg.brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de (Joerg Brunsmann) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology Juergen.Kahrs@t-online.de (Juergen Kahrs) (1999-10-13)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Joerg Brunsmann <joerg.brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 11 Oct 1999 02:38:43 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 99-10-023 99-10-029
Keywords: C++, practice

Juergen Kahrs wrote:


> Really, has it reached a "reliable status" ?


After reading


    http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/portable-cpp.html


the answer is 'no'. For example:


1.Don't use C++ templates.


2.Don't use static constructors.


3.Don't use exceptions.


4.Don't use Run-time Type Information.


5.Don't use namespace facility.


...


J=F6rg

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.