Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. chase@world.std.com (David Chase) (1999-07-11) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (1999-07-12) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. johnmce@world.std.com (1999-07-12) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. t.hutt@worldnet.att.net (Taylor Hutt) (1999-07-12) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. pmai@acm.org (1999-07-14) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. darcy@moa.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1999-07-14) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (1999-07-14) |
Re: Empirical data: assembly source vs. HLL source. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1999-07-21) |
From: | adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (A Johnstone) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Jul 1999 11:49:34 -0400 |
Organization: | Royal Holloway, University of London |
References: | 99-07-023 99-07-038 99-07-042 99-07-051 |
Keywords: | assembler |
: > [There's no reason that assemblers have to have awful syntax. ...
For a contemporary example of an assembler with a more algebraic
style, see the Analog Devices assembler for their ADSP 21xx Digital
Signal Processors. Control structures are not well supported (apart
from DO UNTIL which is an ADSP-21xx hardware primitive) but arithmetic
expressions use operators, rather then prefix opcodes. (Actually there
are some serious infelicities that arise from this approach, but it
has some good ideas).
Adrian
--
Dr Adrian Johnstone, Senior Lecturer in Computing, Computer Science Dep,
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, England.
Email a.johnstone@rhbnc.ac.uk Tel:+44(0)1784 443425 Fax:+44(0)1784 439786
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.