Related articles |
---|
Intermediate language tools2@gate.net (Jim Prince) (1999-04-18) |
Re: Intermediate language dwight@pentasoft.com (1999-04-19) |
Re: Intermediate language mph@zdenka.demon.co.uk (Mike Harrison) (1999-04-19) |
Re: Intermediate language bob.morgan@digital.com (1999-04-19) |
Re: Intermediate language jamz@my-dejanews.com (1999-04-19) |
Re: Intermediate language rogerha@aol.com (1999-04-22) |
From: | jamz@my-dejanews.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 19 Apr 1999 14:58:33 -0400 |
Organization: | Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion |
References: | 99-04-056 |
Keywords: | design |
Jim Prince <tools2@gate.net> wrote:
> I tried to start a discussion on intermediate languages and was
> unsuccessful. Thank you to the people that replied directly to me.
> What I would like is a discussion on the what, where, whys of
> designing an intermediate language. I have read the red dragon book
> and others and have been confused. I would like to abstract the
> problem, but do not have enough experience.
>
I missed your original post, but you might find
this paper interesting: http://www.antlr.org/papers/sorcerer.ps
It goes into details about representing a program as a tree and how to write
tree grammars and do tree transformations.
Monty
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.