Related articles |
---|
Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? prinz@c2i.net (XlatB) (1999-04-09) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Mogensen) (1999-04-18) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? whitten@netcom.com (David Whitten) (1999-04-18) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? mallors@ips1.msfc.nasa.gov (1999-04-19) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? bill@megahits.com (Bill A.) (1999-04-22) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? andersh@maths.lth.se (Anders Holtsberg) (1999-05-03) |
Re: Jack W. Crenshaw - Any clues how to optimize ? mikee@cetasoft.cog (1999-05-07) |
From: | XlatB <prinz@c2i.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 Apr 1999 14:03:02 -0400 |
Organization: | Tele2 Norway Public Access |
Keywords: | optimize, question |
I am working on simple compiler (currently only a "basic" to x86 asm
converter). It is based on the model by Jack W. Crenshaw. (Author of
"Let's build a compiler" or something very similar). I am having
problems to accept the inefficiency on the expression calculations.
The code output is way below acceptable. Now i was wondering, how do i
optimize this to be any better? I was thinking about a postfix
solution, but since this compiler is going to a singleparse, i have to
do this exclusivly for expressions. I havent been able to write a good
solution for this problem, as if often tend to "fixing" the postfix
routine. Could someone help me with this? And also, i have problems
on designing the string allocation system. The target mode is Windows
Protected mode. Could someone give me some clues to this, as i am
still a bit off.
I have been searching the net the last 4 days, obviously in the wrong
places.
Sten D. Sørsdal
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.