Related articles |
---|
A C compiler written in C targeting C dg@tao.co.uk (1999-03-23) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C mikee@cetasoft.cog (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C kadhim@lucent.com (Basim Kadhim) (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C nshaf@intur.net (Nick Shaffner) (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C dmk42@my-dejanews.com (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C derek@knosof.co.uk (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C eclectictech@usa.net (1999-03-28) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C dg@tao.co.uk (1999-04-01) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C zalman@netcom.com (1999-04-03) |
Re: A C compiler written in C targeting C gillga@ilk.de (1999-05-16) |
From: | dmk42@my-dejanews.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 28 Mar 1999 16:57:56 -0500 |
Organization: | Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion |
References: | 99-03-067 |
Keywords: | C, tools |
dg@tao.co.uk (David Given) wrote:
> Are there any compilers (lcc, gcc) around that have C back ends?
You might want to take a look at the SUIF compiler,
http://suif.stanford.edu. It can generate C after reading in and
transforming the code.
At last look, SUIF v2 was still quite slow. SUIF v1 might still be
the way to go.
David Keaton
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.