Related articles |
---|
Class representation in memory McMalo@HotMail.com (McMalo) (1999-02-24) |
Re: Class representation in memory mikee@cetasoft.cog (1999-02-25) |
Re: Class representation in memory mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (1999-02-27) |
Re: Class representation in memory hunk@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (1999-02-27) |
Re: Class representation in memory steinar.soreide@loop.no (Steinar Søreide) (1999-03-02) |
Re: Class representation in memory dtribble@technologist.com (David R Tribble) (1999-03-10) |
Re: Class representation in memory jsgray@acm.org.nospam (Jan Gray) (1999-03-22) |
Re: Class representation in memory dzabel@berlin.snafu.de (Dirk Zabel) (1999-03-23) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | mikee@cetasoft.cog (Mike Enright) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Feb 1999 01:34:18 -0500 |
Organization: | CetaSoft (com not cog) |
References: | 99-02-115 |
Keywords: | OOP |
On 24 Feb 1999 12:25:52 -0500, McMalo <McMalo@HotMail.com> wrote:
>I am looking for any literature about Class representation in memory.
>How a compiler/interpreter builds this stuff in memory, and how it
>manages it.
All the languages are different. But Stroustrup describes some of the
details of C++ in "D+E", "Design and Evolution of C++". Some details
of C++ are standardized and so would be both in the ISO standard and
in the more advanced C++ books. Virtual function dispatch is not
standardized except as to requirements, but Stroustrup's works usually
describe some form of v-table, which is common among C++
implementations. There's some heavy v-table hackery in Coplein's
"Advanced C++: Styles and Idioms."
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.