Related articles |
---|
What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? joe.hotchkiss@gecm.com (Joe Hotchkiss) (1999-02-18) |
Re: What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? dwight@pentasoft.com (1999-02-21) |
Re: What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? paul.janssens@skynet.be.NOSPAM (JPA) (1999-02-21) |
Re: What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? bromage@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1999-02-21) |
Re: What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? jamz@my-dejanews.com (1999-02-24) |
Re: What IS an LL/LR/SLR/LALR etc. grammar? mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il (Ehud Lamm) (1999-02-24) |
From: | Joe Hotchkiss <joe.hotchkiss@gecm.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 18 Feb 1999 10:47:30 -0500 |
Organization: | GEC-Marconi Avionics Ltd |
Keywords: | parse, question |
I have been writing a small recursive descent parser, mostly for my own
amusement, and have been trying to document it for others to use. In
doing so I have tried to give definitions of some terms, but I can't
actually find a clear definition of the various types of grammar.
So far,
LL(1) = scans input left-to-right, produces output for the
left-most bits first, and looks ahead at most 1 symbol at a time.
LR(1) = scans input left-to-right, produces output for the
right-most bits first (but does so in reverse order for some reason!),
and looks ahead at most 1 symbol at a time.
LALR(1) = Look-Ahead LR(1), but the (1) indicates that it looks
ahead 1 symbol anyway, so what is the difference? I have seen clear
statements that LR(1) is NOT the same as LALR(1).
Then there are SLR and SLALR grammars and quite possibly others that I
have not come across yet. All the books I have read use at least some
of these terms but I can find no systematic attempt to say what the
differences are.
Can anyone help or at least suggest a book with clear definitions?
Thank you.
Joe
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.