Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes

"Paulo Machado" <Paulo@PlanetSmart.com>
10 Feb 1999 16:02:34 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
alternatives to java byte-codes jafrutos@eui.upm.es (Juan Alberto de Frutos Velasco) (1999-01-27)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes olivier.lefevre@wdr.com (Olivier Lefevre) (1999-01-31)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes niall@cuc.ucc.ie (Niall Dalton) (1999-02-01)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes dgay@barnowl.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David Gay) (1999-02-03)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes jerpat@iastate.edu (1999-02-05)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes kistler@ics.uci.edu (Thomas Kistler) (1999-02-07)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes Paulo@PlanetSmart.com (Paulo Machado) (1999-02-10)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes jcea@argo.es (Jesus Cea Avion) (1999-02-10)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes niall@cuc.ucc.ie (Niall Dalton) (1999-02-12)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes chase@world.std.com (David Chase) (1999-02-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Paulo Machado" <Paulo@PlanetSmart.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Feb 1999 16:02:34 -0500
Organization: Planet Smart Corporation
References: 99-01-096 99-02-023
Keywords: Java

> I think there are at least two reasons why the designers of Java use
>byte codes. One is ease of optimization and the other is security.


Enabling a Java native CPU is possibly the major reason for that decision,
where the byte codes are the machine code instructions for that CPU.


-------------------------------------------
Paulo Machado
President, Planet Smart Corporation


E-mail: Paulo@PlanetSmart.com
Web: http://PlanetSmart.com
Voice/Fax: 301.216.0953

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.