Related articles |
---|
alternatives to java byte-codes jafrutos@eui.upm.es (Juan Alberto de Frutos Velasco) (1999-01-27) |
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes olivier.lefevre@wdr.com (Olivier Lefevre) (1999-01-31) |
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes niall@cuc.ucc.ie (Niall Dalton) (1999-02-01) |
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes dgay@barnowl.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David Gay) (1999-02-03) |
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes jerpat@iastate.edu (1999-02-05) |
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes kistler@ics.uci.edu (Thomas Kistler) (1999-02-07) |
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes Paulo@PlanetSmart.com (Paulo Machado) (1999-02-10) |
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes jcea@argo.es (Jesus Cea Avion) (1999-02-10) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | Olivier Lefevre <olivier.lefevre@wdr.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 31 Jan 1999 23:47:57 -0500 |
Organization: | Warburg Dillon Read |
References: | 99-01-096 |
Keywords: | Java, interpreter |
Juan Alberto de Frutos Velasco wrote:
> I'm looking for works about alternatives for java byte-codes used by
> java.
>
> More precisely, I'd like to study the advantages of using structures
> like AST (abstract syntax tree).
Juice (http://caesar.ics.uci.edu/juice/) comes to mind. I have heard
they were trying to port their approach to Java but running into
some problems.
-- O.L.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.