Re: p-code compilers

Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
25 Jan 1999 21:52:34 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
p-code compilers ec98bna@brunel.ac.uk (Bogomil Alexondrov) (1999-01-22)
Re: p-code compilers dwight@pentasoft.com (1999-01-23)
Re: p-code compilers genew@vip.net (1999-01-23)
Re: p-code compilers derekross@fisheracre.freeserve.co.uk (Derek Ross) (1999-01-23)
Re: p-code compilers eodell@pobox.com (1999-01-25)
Re: p-code compilers toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1999-01-25)
Re: p-code compilers aaron@farol.chem.purdue.edu (Aaron F. Stanton) (1999-01-27)
Re: p-code compilers wlohmann@informatik.uni-rostock.de (1999-01-27)
Re: p-code compilers rock@twr.com (Robert Howard) (1999-01-31)
Re: p-code compilers sda@rt66.com (1999-01-31)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 25 Jan 1999 21:52:34 -0500
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
References: 99-01-078
Keywords: translator

Bogomil Alexondrov wrote:


> Does somebody know a website focused on pseudo code compilers and
> especially possible optimizations for it. btw can a program not
> generating machine code but pseudo code be called compiler or is it a
> translator? what is the exact definition for compiler? Java is
> generating pseudo code so it must be a translator rather than
> compiler?


I tend to look at the way the compiler/translator works. E.g., I call
f2c a compiler, because it reads in Fortran code, parses it, builds a
symbol table, converts it to an internal representation and then - in
stead of generating assembler - it spits out C.


--
Toon Moene (toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl)
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Phone: +31 346 214290; Fax: +31 346 214286
g77 Support: fortran@gnu.org; egcs: egcs-bugs@cygnus.com


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.