Related articles |
---|
Facts about the Java class file format pilz@ifi.unizh.ch (Markus Pilz) (1998-10-17) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format tlh20@cam.ac.uk (Tim Harris) (1998-10-21) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format jgm@CS.Cornell.EDU (Greg Morrisett) (1998-10-24) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format monnier+comp/compilers/news/@tequila.cs.yale.edu (Stefan Monnier) (1998-10-30) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format Jan.Vitek@cui.unige.ch (1998-10-30) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format pilz@ifi.unizh.ch (1998-10-30) |
Re: Facts about the Java class file format albaugh@agames.com (1998-11-01) |
From: | "Greg Morrisett" <jgm@CS.Cornell.EDU> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Oct 1998 01:46:59 -0400 |
Organization: | Cornell University |
References: | 98-10-108 98-10-129 |
Keywords: | Java |
>[It also occurs to me that small size is important when you're
>transferring a Java app, but less important when you're running it.
>Netscape ships their Java code in zip files, where it's typically
>compressed by about 50%. How much better than that is anyone likely
>to do and still have a format that's useful for execution? -John]
There was a paper in PLDI ('97?) by Steve Lucco and either Dave
Hanson or Chris Frasier that described a way to get much better
compression on "binaries" than what you get with gzip.
-Greg
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.