|ASN.1:1994 grammar for bison ? email@example.com (Marc De Preter) (1998-10-05)|
|Re: ASN.1:1994 grammar for bison ? Marko.Makela@HUT.FI (Marko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4kel=E4?=) (1998-10-06)|
|Re: ASN.1:1994 grammar for bison ? firstname.lastname@example.org (Rajappa Iyer) (1998-10-10)|
|Re: ASN.1:1994 grammar for bison ? Marko.Makela@HUT.FI (Marko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4kel=E4?=) (1998-10-13)|
|From:||Marko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4kel=E4?= <Marko.Makela@HUT.FI>|
|Date:||13 Oct 1998 02:16:16 -0400|
|Organization:||Helsinki University of Technology, CS lab|
|References:||98-10-037 98-10-047 98-10-070|
>>>>> "Rajappa" == Rajappa Iyer <email@example.com> writes:
Rajappa> Why don't you start off from snacc? The effort involved in
Rajappa> modifying snacc to deal with ASN.1:1994 may be less than
Rajappa> writing the whole thing from scratch.
Because I didn't know about SNACC. We already have written our ASN.1
compiler. It is really a pity, since also SNACC is distributed under
the GNU General Public License. The only advantages of our ASN.1
compiler I can think of is that it is written in C++ using STL, and
the semantic analysis performed by it is rather complete.
Marko> If you are going to support the ASN.1 classes and objects (with
Marko> user-defineable syntax), I wish you good luck!
Rajappa> Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't MACROs deprecated (and
Rajappa> more or less redundant) with 1994?
MACROs yes, but they were replaced by CLASSes, which have an
user-defineable syntax. Does anyone know how the ASN.1 compilers that
support the ASN1:1994 Information Object Specifications (IOS) are
implemented? Is a separate preprocessor used? Or maybe some really
cruel lexer hacks?
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.