Related articles |
---|
Intermediate Language Design? felixmish@usa.net (Felix Mish) (1998-10-06) |
Re: Intermediate Language Design? fs29@rummelplatz.uni-mannheim.de (1998-10-07) |
Re: Intermediate Language Design? etienne_gagnon@my-dejanews.com (1998-10-07) |
Re: Intermediate Language Design? dwight@pentasoft.com (1998-10-07) |
Re: Intermediate Language Design? vmakarov@cygnus.com (Vladimir Makarov) (1998-10-07) |
Re: Intermediate Language Design? pjk@bcs.org.uk (Peter Knaggs) (1998-10-13) |
From: | dwight@pentasoft.com (Dwight VandenBerghe) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 7 Oct 1998 23:04:50 -0400 |
Organization: | http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here |
References: | 98-10-045 |
Keywords: | design |
On 6 Oct 1998 15:22:51 -0400, Felix Mish <felixmish@usa.net> wrote:
>[If you just want to interpret it, I like strings of RPN tokens and a
>simple stack-based interpreter. -John]
John's idea is good. I like strings of prefix tokens instead, because
I think they're easier to debug. Also, avoid going with a binary file
- just output ascii, with a newline at the end of a logical node, and
you can even indent to show tree structure. I mean, to do this in the
file itself.
If you haven't chosen a language for the interpreter yet, may I
suggest Perl? It's great for this kind of thing.
Dwight
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.