Related articles |
---|
Looking for tool to generate C/C++ crossrefs andrewb@cs.washington.edu (Andrew Berg) (1998-10-04) |
Re: Looking for tool to generate C/C++ crossrefs ok@atlas.otago.ac.nz (Dr Richard A. O'Keefe) (1998-10-06) |
Re: Looking for tool to generate C/C++ crossrefs keil@ert.rwth-aachen.de (Wolfgang Keil) (1998-10-07) |
Re: Looking for tool to generate C/C++ crossrefs ludemann@inxight.com (1998-10-10) |
Re: Looking for tool to generate C/C++ crossrefs jaxon@soltec.net (Greg Jaxon) (1998-10-13) |
From: | Andrew Berg <andrewb@cs.washington.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 Oct 1998 01:15:00 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | C, C++, tools, question, comment |
I am looking for a tool to generate cross references for a collection
of C/C++ source and header files. Basically all I want is for each
symbol to know the line it is defined on and the lines it is
referenced on. Ideally this would include preprocessor macros.
I have considered so far:
Writing my own. This looks like a lot of work even if I start with
existing C/C++ grammars and just add the 100 lines or so to keep track
of the symbols, because I still have to write my own preprocessor to
resolve macros. Does anybody know how to avoid doing that?
Building a custom gcc. Making a gcc just dump out the stuff I need
may or may not be so hard, I have not looked, but it is my
understanding that I will not have any information about the macros.
Can anybody confirm or deny this?
Is there any other options that I just don't see?
Thanks,
-andrew
[There are various ways to fake it, e.g., compile to assembler or
object and extract the symbols from there, but doing a good
crossreference is a challenge, particularly if you want to do
something reasonable with symbols mentioned in macros and the like.
-John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.