Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers?

Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@cygnus.com>
22 Sep 1998 22:29:35 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? chseet@mbox2.singnet.com.sg (C. H. Seet) (1998-09-22)
Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? vmakarov@cygnus.com (Vladimir Makarov) (1998-09-22)
Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? corbett@lupa.Eng.Sun.COM (1998-09-24)
Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? corbett@lupa.Eng.Sun.COM (1998-09-24)
Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? mtew@cds.duke.edu (Max TenEyck Woodbury) (1998-09-26)
Re: Anyone extended MAXTABLE in yacc parsers? vadik@siber.com (Vadim Maslov) (1998-09-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@cygnus.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Sep 1998 22:29:35 -0400
Organization: Cygnus Solutions
References: 98-09-105
Keywords: yacc, comment

Unfortunately bison has also analogous constraints. You could try MSTA in
COCOM toolset on


http://visitweb.com/cocom


MSTA supports SYSTEM V YACC and Posix YACC and has no constraints on tables
size. The single constraint is only your virtual memory size. The
important difference MSTA from bison and byacc which I know - there is no
implicit attribute propagation.


C. H. Seet wrote:


> I'm using byacc 1.9 on Win32 platform, and I've been trying to generate
> a parse table with about 130000 elements (grammar is large).
[Bison is a mutant version of byacc, the internal structures are the same
the last I checked. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.