SLR vs. LALR

"Jonas Nielsen" <jonasn@diku.dk>
19 Aug 1998 21:27:56 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
SLR vs. LALR jonasn@diku.dk (Jonas Nielsen) (1998-08-19)
Re: SLR vs. LALR mkjacobs@erols.com (Eric Jacobs) (1998-08-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Jonas Nielsen" <jonasn@diku.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Aug 1998 21:27:56 -0400
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Keywords: parse, theory, question

Which parsers can be generated by a grammar that are not SLR but
LALR. I am searching for a subset of a grammar for an "existing"
language. I have once read that the grammar for C++ is not SLR but
only LALR, but could anyone please list me the subset of the grammar
where the troubles are, and explain why.


Thanks, Jonas
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.