Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (1998-08-10) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs darcy@usul.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1998-08-13) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs darcy@usul.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1998-08-13) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de (Joachim Durchholz) (1998-08-17) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs lindahl@cs.virginia.edu (1998-08-19) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs jfc@mit.edu (1998-08-19) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de (Joachim Durchholz) (1998-08-19) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs roy@prism.gatech.edu (1998-08-20) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs awf@robots.ox.ac.uk (Andrew Fitzgibbon) (1998-08-20) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (1998-08-22) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs luddy@concmp.com (Luddy Harrison) (1998-09-18) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (1998-09-19) |
| Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs luddy@concmp.com (Luddy Harrison) (1998-09-22) |
| [17 later articles] |
| From: | Joachim Durchholz <joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 19 Aug 1998 16:20:55 -0400 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 98-08-056 98-08-085 98-08-119 |
| Keywords: | arithmetic, comment |
> [Hey, I didn't say approximate. I said wrong. There's a difference.
> -John]
Well, whether an inconsistency in the last few bits is an approximation
or plain wrong depends heavily on the application. Which is exactly the
point that I tried to make :)
Regards,
Joachim
--
[I still think we agree. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.