Re: parsing c++ without a symbol table!

"Quinn Tyler Jackson" <qjackson@wave.home.com>
28 Jul 1998 11:27:33 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
parsing c++ without a symbol table! gregory.knapen@bell.ca (KNAPEN, GREGORY) (1998-07-27)
Re: parsing c++ without a symbol table! dlmoore@pgroup.com (David L Moore) (1998-07-27)
Re: parsing c++ without a symbol table! qjackson@wave.home.com (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (1998-07-28)
Re: parsing c++ without a symbol table! jason@cygnus.com (Jason Merrill) (1998-07-28)
Re: parsing c++ without a symbol table! mac@coos.dartmouth.edu (1998-07-30)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Quinn Tyler Jackson" <qjackson@wave.home.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Jul 1998 11:27:33 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 98-07-199
Keywords: C++, parse

>1. ambiguity between function call and variable declaration
>
>ex: T(a); or T(*a); etc..


Where T is a class, I've always considered all such declarations to be
function calls, where the member function in question is the constructor,
and where the return value is a non-const reference to an anonymous object.


--
Quinn Tyler Jackson
Research Programmer
email: qjackson@wave.home.com
url: http://www.qtj.net/~quinn/
ftp: qtj.net
--
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.