Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1?

James Powell <james@advancedsw.com>
20 Jul 1998 17:03:31 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? james@advancedsw.com (James Powell) (1998-07-10)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? egagnon@sprynet.com (Etienne Gagnon) (1998-07-11)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? gkasten@auco.com (Glenn Kasten) (1998-07-13)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? Joerg.Brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de (Joerg Brunsmann) (1998-07-17)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? james@advancedsw.com (James Powell) (1998-07-20)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? sreeni@csc.albany.edu (1998-07-20)
Re: Definitive grammar for Java 1.1? thetick@magelang.com (Scott Stanchfield) (1998-07-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: James Powell <james@advancedsw.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 20 Jul 1998 17:03:31 -0400
Organization: Advanced Software Technologies, Inc.
References: 98-07-097 98-07-122
Keywords: Java, parse

Hi,


My thanks go out to Glenn and Etienne for their enlightening responses.
Etienne, I've downloaded a copy of SableCC - an impressive tool. It's good to
have a look at another Java 1.1 grammar for comparison purposes, and I hope to
try some experiments with SableCC in our environment (I work with the reverse
engineering of source code for an object-oriented design tool).


Glenn, the error/ambiguity document you mentioned is interesting, and will
provide fodder for another round of verification of our grammar before we
release the product. I do hope that the ISO standard for Java is released
soon, and in the mean time we'll do the best we can to adjust the grammar for
user's expectations.


Thanks,
    -James-


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Powell - Software Engineer/Reverse Engineering - james@advancedsw.com
                              Advanced Software Technologies, Inc.
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.