Related articles |
---|
Alternatives to Regexps john@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za (John Carter) (1998-07-08) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps ak@muc.de (1998-07-10) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Mogensen) (1998-07-10) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps jamz@cdsnet.net (1998-07-10) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps d.rourke@arpc.com (Daniel Rourke) (1998-07-10) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (1998-07-10) |
Re: Alternatives to Regexps bpr@best.com (Brian Rogoff) (1998-07-10) |
[6 later articles] |
From: | John Carter <john@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Jul 1998 01:34:43 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | DFA, design |
Greetings folk,
I'm seeking pointers to alternatives to standard regular expression
languages.
The original theoretical definition of regexp's resulted in
expressions which were simple and clear and readable.
But life is always complicated and the various pragmatic
implementations of regexps sub-languages found in Perl/Emacs/grep
etc. etc. all have major extensions to the theoretic version and all
have slight differences and all have complex special case rules.
So what I'm seeking are pointers to a far more readable, elegant and
consistent pragmatic pattern recognition language.
Thank you,
John Carter EMail: ece@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za
Telephone : 27-12-808-0374x194 Fax:- 27-12-808-0338
<http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947> or <http://iwqs.pwv.gov.za>
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.