Related articles |
---|
Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) jpripp@ecsu.campus.mci.net (Jason Tripp) (1998-06-27) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) Alexandru.Petrescu@crpht.lu (Alexandru Petrescu) (1998-06-28) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-06-28) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan) (1998-07-01) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) burley@cygnus.com (Craig Burley) (1998-07-01) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) (1998-07-01) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) tim@wagner.princeton.edu (1998-07-08) |
Re: Port of GCC to Intel IA-64 architecture (Merced) fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-07-10) |
From: | Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 Jul 1998 22:52:44 -0400 |
Organization: | Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. |
References: | 98-06-153 |
Keywords: | GCC, architecture |
>[How about making GCC work with 64 bit addresses and data? -John]
As pointed out, gcc already does that just fine -- witness the Alpha
port of gcc (which was the reason it got done, I believe). Also SPARC
v9, and MIPS ports. To the best of my knowledge, though, it does not
handle being a cross-compiler from a 32-bit host to a 64-bit target.
Oops ;).
The real problem with an IA-64 port is that Intel is not giving out
any info about the ISA without an NDA, which kinda has a problem with
the GPL. (Kinda, but not completely.)
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.