Related articles |
---|
Lex and Yacc: Dumb Question splitperson@bellsouth.net (Faustino E. Osuna) (1998-06-18) |
Re: Lex and Yacc: Dumb Question lgcl01@es.co.nz (1998-06-24) |
Re: Lex and Yacc: Dumb Question mtimmerm@microstar.no-spam.com (Matt Timmermans) (1998-06-24) |
Re: Lex and Yacc: Dumb Question redsys@interaccess.com (Mark Bracey) (1998-08-02) |
From: | "Matt Timmermans" <mtimmerm@microstar.no-spam.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Jun 1998 23:48:34 -0400 |
Organization: | IGS - Information Gateway Services |
References: | 98-06-078 98-06-128 |
Keywords: | lex, yacc, Pascal |
>If you do find an answer please email me as I am also looking for a version
>of Lex and Yacc which is better than TPLY which outputs Pascal source code.
>I really want something that is compatabile with the Unix versions of Lex
>and Yacc to a major extent.
If you're not religious about having you Lex and Yacc _written_ in Pascal,
I've found that Berkeley yacc (byacc) is quite easy to modify to generate
whatever output format you like. And its free.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.