Related articles |
---|
[2 earlier articles] |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) ok@atlas.otago.ac.nz (Dr Richard A. O'Keefe) (1998-05-07) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) dwight@pentasoft.com (1998-05-12) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) eeide@cs.utah.edu (Eric Eide) (1998-05-12) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) will@ccs.neu.edu (William D Clinger) (1998-05-12) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) ct7@mitre.org (W. Craig Trader) (1998-05-15) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (1998-05-15) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) johnrn@ibm.net (1998-05-17) |
Re: Compilers for systems programming (was: A C style compiler) jmccarty@sun1307.spd.dsccc.com (1998-05-27) |
From: | johnrn@ibm.net (john ) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 17 May 1998 00:16:32 -0400 |
Organization: | IBM.NET |
References: | 98-05-017 98-05-052 98-05-060 |
Keywords: | history |
"Dr Richard A. O'Keefe" ><ok@atlas.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>>...IBM's "systems programming" dialect of PL/I (PL/S, wasn't it?)
dwight@pentasoft.com (Dwight VandenBerghe) wrote:
>...We all wanted PL/S desperately; they never released
>it, at least not by the end of my mainframe days, which was around
>1978. Supposedly it was highly optimizing.
Dwight:
PL/S is still going strong within IBM. I still believe that it has
never been released to customers.
It is called PL/X and there are versions of it for many platforms.
It is heavily used within IBM for system programming.
Over the years, the features that it provides has grown exponentially.
John
[PL/X? Gee, that was its original name back on the GE 635 where I
encountered it at Dartmouth. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.