Compiler Deisgn.

Matthew Webb <Matthew.Webb@net1.demon.co.uk>
12 May 1998 22:17:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compiler Deisgn. Matthew.Webb@net1.demon.co.uk (Matthew Webb) (1998-05-12)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. dwight@pentasoft.com (1998-05-15)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. abbottk@earthlink.net (Kirk Abbott) (1998-05-15)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. djg@argus.vki.bke.hu (Gabor DEAK JAHN) (1998-05-16)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1998-05-27)
Re: Compiler Design. td@sysinno.se (Torbjorn Drevin) (1998-05-30)
Re: Compiler Design. tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (1998-06-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Matthew Webb <Matthew.Webb@net1.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 May 1998 22:17:10 -0400
Organization: none
Keywords: optimize, question

Hi,
      I have written a disassembler and a comming assembler. I have not
studied compiler design and so do not know the best way of doing it. My
diassembler/assembler are bassically just one massive case statment on
the bytes or text strings. The look identical but the reversed. They are
just a single pass, nothing fancy.


Can anyone give another structure other than a case statment please?


Thank you.
--
Matthew Webb - London - Creator of alt.os.assembly & alt.os.develpoment
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.