Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter

hgg9140@heckle.ca.boeing.com (Harry G. George)
18 Mar 1998 22:50:10 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Techniques for writing an interpreter simon@magnorth.nildram.co.uk (Simon Chapman) (1998-03-06)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com (Nick Roberts) (1998-03-08)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (1998-03-12)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter ct7@mitre.org (W. Craig Trader) (1998-03-15)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-03-15)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter psu@jprc.com (Peter Su) (1998-03-18)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter hgg9140@heckle.ca.boeing.com (1998-03-18)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) (1998-03-18)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter dhansen@btree.com (1998-03-18)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter dent@cs.tu-berlin.de (Pierre Mai) (1998-03-18)
recursive comments and Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter monnier+comp/compilers/news/@tequila.cs.yale.edu (Stefan Monnier) (1998-03-20)
Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter markh@usai.asiainfo.com (Mark Harrison) (1998-03-20)
Re: recursive comments and Re: Techniques for writing an interpreter sestoft@ellemose.dina.kvl.dk (1998-03-20)
[19 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: hgg9140@heckle.ca.boeing.com (Harry G. George)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Mar 1998 22:50:10 -0500
Organization: The Boeing Company
References: 98-03-032 98-03-098 98-03-141 98-03-147
Keywords: interpreter, question

Is there any consensus forming about GNU's Guile? I don't see it
mentioned in these references to scripting/embeddable langauges, but
it seems to me Scheme is a good place to start. You aren't likely to
run out of power 6 months downstream. But they _must_ get a solid
module system in place.
--
Name: Harry George
Phone: (425) 237-6915 M-S: 6H-WT
Email: harry.g.george@boeing.com
Supporting: Knowledge-Based Product Definition (KBPD)
[I don't know of anyone that uses it. Scheme is a swell language, but
the installed base for existing Emacs lisp and TCL can be daunting. -John]




--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.