Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Experimental languages. s720@ii.uib.no (Thomas M. Farrelly) (1998-02-12) |
| Re: Experimental languages. albaugh@agames.com (1998-02-14) |
| Re: Experimental languages. torbenm@diku.dk (1998-02-14) |
| Re: Experimental languages. gsg@lipa.mimuw.edu.pl (Grzegorz Grudzinski) (1998-02-18) |
| Re: Experimental languages. gergoe@math.bme.hu (Buday Gergely) (1998-02-18) |
| Re: Experimental languages. mkgardne@cs.uiuc.edu (1998-02-20) |
| From: | Buday Gergely <gergoe@math.bme.hu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 18 Feb 1998 23:13:19 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| Keywords: | design |
: I'm looking for references/links to highly experimental programming
: languages with focus on both syntactic and semantic consistency.
Language design is a strongly _human_
activity and is as much about communication with other people
(including later stages of the author's life) as with machines.
##### Agree, and see my offer below
[I'd say that Common Lisp resembles MS Word in its kitchen-sink-ness,
but Scheme remains one of the cleanest and most productive languages
around. -John]
Standard ML with the Basis Library is the winner for me,
just to put my 2c here.
Standard ML of New Jersey is a good implementation of it, and is freely
available:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/what/smlnj/index.html
it includes ML-Lex,ML-Yacc,Concurrent ML, ML-Burg.
see comp.lang.ml for the language.
- Gergely
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.