Re: which is better, bison++ or bison-A2.6

Alain Coetmeur" <acoetmeur@icdc.caissedesdepots.fr>
18 Feb 1998 22:59:10 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
which is better, bison++ or bison-A2.6 bweinra@uswest.com (Bret D Weinraub) (1998-02-12)
Re: which is better, bison++ or bison-A2.6 acoetmeur@icdc.caissedesdepots.fr (Alain Coetmeur) (1998-02-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Alain Coetmeur" <acoetmeur@icdc.caissedesdepots.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Feb 1998 22:59:10 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 98-02-054
Keywords: yacc, lex, C++

As the (lone) builder of bison++-1.21-7 and flex++-2.3.7-8 I would givve all
my trust to flex2.5 and bisonA2.6...


flex2.4 have a very nice, and simple design and works well with bison++


bisonA2.6 is probably the evolution of bisonA1, which was very promising
at it's time... it must be good, yet I know nothing about it.




Flex++ and bison++ works well, but they have not evolved for years
(I have no time) and ahe an obsoleted basis (flex2.3 and bison 1.21)


If anybody know good c++ scanners/parsers I'm also veruy interested.


--
Alain Coetmeur. Informatique-CDC , mailto:acoetmeur@icdc.caissedesdepots.fr
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.