Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar

HAJNAL Akos <hajnal@eik.bme.hu>
11 Jan 1998 23:53:50 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar hajnal@eik.bme.hu (HAJNAL Akos) (1998-01-11)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar thetick@magelang.com (Scott Stanchfield) (1998-01-14)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar clark@quarry.zk3.dec.com (Chris Clark USG) (1998-01-20)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar Bronikov@inreach.com (Dmitri&Nina Bronnikov) (1998-01-21)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar corbett@lupa.Eng.Sun.COM (1998-01-23)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar khays@sequent.com (1998-01-23)
Re: Shift/reduce conflict in Yacc C grammar cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (1998-01-24)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: HAJNAL Akos <hajnal@eik.bme.hu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 11 Jan 1998 23:53:50 -0500
Organization: Technical University of Budapest
Keywords: C, parse, yacc, question, comment

Hi,
I downloaded the ANSI C grammar from
http://kbs.cs.tu-berlin.de/~jutta/c/ANSI-C-grammar-l.html,
http://kbs.cs.tu-berlin.de/~jutta/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html,
and compiled these in lex, and yacc.
The above grammar contains a shift/reduce conflict at
the definitions if-then, if-then-else.
For this reason I can not put actions within these rules,
i.e. for example after parsing the condition part.


My question is that, there is available a C grammar in lex/yacc
that does not contain any shift/reduce conflict?
Can such grammar exsist?


Thanks: Akos Hajnal
[I doubt you'll find any if-then-else constructs where yacc will let you
embed actions in any grammar. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.