Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Payware ??? autom@earthlink.net (Paul Mann) (1997-12-16) |
| Re: Payware ??? dwight@pentasoft.com (1997-12-16) |
| Re: Payware ??? amoroso@mclink.it (1997-12-17) |
| Re: Payware ??? gclind01@spd.louisville.edu (1997-12-19) |
| Re: Payware ??? guerby@gnat.com (Laurent Guerby) (1997-12-23) |
| From: | "Paul Mann" <autom@earthlink.net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 16 Dec 1997 11:25:12 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| Keywords: | practice, question |
I'd like to know how many software developers are using a free
compiler for their work.
I'll bet most are using Microsoft Visual C++ and I'll bet it wasn't
free.
Then I'd like to know how good it would have been if it were free.
My toolkit is not free, because I'm not a professor at a university,
wish I were but ...
If I were to give it away for free, I would be announcing version 1.0
instead of 5.0.
I've thought about giving it away for free. Any ideas, I'm listening
....
Paul Mann
autom@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~autom
[Depends on the platform. My impression is that most development on
Unix systems uses gcc and g++ which are freeware. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.