Related articles |
---|
Evaluation of parser generators wclodius@aol.com (1997-12-10) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators kadhim@spock.cs.colorado.edu (Basim Kadhim) (1997-12-12) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators thetick@magelang.com (Scott Stanchfield) (1997-12-12) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators wclodius@aol.com (1997-12-14) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators wclodius@aol.com (1997-12-14) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators cwilson@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (1997-12-15) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators parrt@magelang.com (Terence Parr) (1997-12-15) |
Re: Evaluation of parser generators d.love@daresbury.ac.uk (Dave Love) (1997-12-23) |
From: | wclodius@aol.com (Wclodius) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Dec 1997 22:37:06 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL http://www.aol.com |
References: | 97-12-092 |
Keywords: | tools |
In response to Basim Kadhims post:
> Eli doesn't really require support tools beyond standard utilities
> you'll find on any Unix machine.
I should note that the early work will be done on my home machine,
which is not currently a Unix processor. I am not ruling out
conversion to Unix at home, but it does make me sensitive to
portability issues.
> We do have a complete grammar for Fortran 77 and 90 (they are
> actually bundled together). The Fortran 77 specification also
> includes an attribute grammar for name and type analysis (and SUIF
> code generation).
I should note that I was very pleased with Waite's documentation of
many of these issues. I was a little surprised in checking up on SUIF
that in the latest version they still seem to be relying on a modified
version of f2c instead of your new version. I was also a little
surprised that you have not followed up with an F90 SUIF generator,
although F90 is unfashionable.
William B. Clodius
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.