Re: any performance profiling tools ??

ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
2 Oct 1997 14:32:59 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
any performance profiling tools ?? chunghsu@george.rutgers.edu (1997-09-23)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? dccoote@werple.mira.net.au (1997-09-28)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? everhart@gce.com (Glenn Everhart) (1997-09-30)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? cfc@world.std.com (1997-10-01)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? steve@blighty.com (1997-10-01)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1997-10-02)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? sanjay@src.dec.com (1997-10-02)
Re: any performance profiling tools ?? jason@reflections.com.au (Jason Patterson) (1997-10-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.arch,comp.benchmarks
Date: 2 Oct 1997 14:32:59 -0400
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
References: 97-09-084 97-09-119 97-09-126 97-10-010
Keywords: performance, testing

steve@blighty.com (Steve Atkins) writes:
>As I understand it ATOM is a general purpose code munger - it
>lets you manipulate the final executable, allowing global
>optimisation, profiling, instrumentation, most things.
...
>Nothing at all to do with SPARC though, which I think is where
>this started. Anyone from Sun out there?


This sounds a lot like EEL, which _is_ available for SPARCs.
Point your browsers at
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~larus/warts.html


The QPT2 tool, that does tracing, is built on top of EEL.


--
John Æneas Byron O'Keefe; 1921/02/04-1997-09-27; TLG,TLTA,BBTNOTL.
Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/%7Eok; RMIT Comp.Sci.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.