Re: Using gcc's parser for Y2k work

Daniel Wang <danwang@dynamic.CS.Princeton.EDU>
30 Aug 1997 00:48:47 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Using gcc's parser for Y2k work lynn@swcp.com (1997-08-28)
Re: Using gcc's parser for Y2k work danwang@dynamic.CS.Princeton.EDU (Daniel Wang) (1997-08-30)
Re: Using gcc's parser for Y2k work jlilley@empathy.com (John Lilley) (1997-08-30)
Re: Using gcc's parser for Y2k work jlilley@empathy.com (John Lilley) (1997-09-03)
Re: Using gcc's parser for Y2k work dweise@microsoft.com (Daniel Weise) (1997-09-07)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Daniel Wang <danwang@dynamic.CS.Princeton.EDU>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 30 Aug 1997 00:48:47 -0400
Organization: Princeton University Department of Computer Science
References: 97-08-077
Keywords: C

lynn@swcp.com (Lynn Wilson) writes:


> Is this a resonable way to go? Would standalone lex/yacc (flex/bison)
> approaches be a better way? I'm concerned that some of the publicly
> available grammars for c/c++ are not complete.
>
> Ideas and suggestions welcomed.


Take a peek at
  http://www.research.microsoft.com/research/analysts/ast.htm
I haven't actually used it myself, just knows it exists and sounds like
its exactly what you're looking for.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.