Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic

jrr@atml.co.uk (John Rickard)
24 Aug 1997 14:54:05 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic tsupplisson@suresnes.marben.fr (Thierry Supplisson) (1997-08-16)
Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic thetick@scruz.net (Scott Stanchfield) (1997-08-19)
Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic genew@vip.net (1997-08-20)
Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic jrr@atml.co.uk (1997-08-24)
Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic thetick@magelang.com (Scott Stanchfield) (1997-09-07)
Re: Look for a LALR grammar for visual basic genew@vip.net (1997-09-12)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: jrr@atml.co.uk (John Rickard)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Aug 1997 14:54:05 -0400
Organization: ATM Ltd
References: 97-08-050 97-08-052 97-08-065
Keywords: parse

Gene Wirchenko (genew@vip.net) wrote:
: Consider the equivalent in C:
: if (x==1)
: {
: exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
: target: }
:
: You could say that there is a null statement before the } and
: that may be so. (I'm not up on the Standard sufficiently to be sure.)


No, this isn't standard C. (It's an extension allowed by gcc, if you
don't use the -ansi -pedantic flags.) You need an explicit null
statement (";"):


                                            if (x==1)
                                                  {
                                                  exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
                        target: ; }


--
John Rickard
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.