Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? poing@luna.nl (1997-07-13) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? mkgardne@cs.uiuc.edu (1997-07-16) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? poing@luna.nl (1997-07-16) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? danwang@dynamic.CS.Princeton.EDU (Daniel Wang) (1997-07-18) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? michael_werts@taligent.com (Michael C. Werts) (1997-07-18) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? kistler@ics.uci.edu (Thomas Kistler) (1997-07-22) |
| Re: Anybody has experience with SLIM BINARIES? pardo@cs.washington.edu (1997-07-22) |
| From: | pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 22 Jul 1997 21:15:23 -0400 |
| Organization: | Computer Science & Engineering, U of Washington, Seattle |
| References: | 97-06-083 97-07-071 97-07-077 97-07-092 |
| Keywords: | Java, UNCOL |
In 97-07-092 the moderator writes:
>[UNCOL alert ... fixed operating systems and data formats ...]
At the risk of repeating the well-known: the problem is deeper than
operating systems and data formats. If you produce an UNCOL for a
single operating system but for M languages and N target architectures
you'll still have "the UNCOL problem."
;-D on ( Crying Java? ) Pardo
[I would go so far as to claim that target architectures with the same
data formats count as a single target, e.g., 68K and Power PC, but the
M languages are plenty to send any UNCOL project into heat death.
Typical problem: in function arguments, C pointers and Fortran arrays
might seem to have similar semantics, but they don't. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.