From: | rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randy Hyde) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.asm.x86 |
Date: | 9 Jul 1997 23:19:28 -0400 |
Organization: | UC Riverside, Dept. of Computer Science |
References: | 97-06-071 97-06-123 97-07-008 97-07-039 |
Keywords: | optimize, practice, C |
>>>>>
And I agree with you about PC C compilers. The quality of Microsoft
compilers' code has clearly declined over the past 4-5 years, and I
suspect it has been a result of pressure to add features to the tools
at the expense of maintaining (or improving) the code generator
quality. And lest I be criticized for Microsoft bashing, I have to
add that Borland and Watcom have lost even more ground.
<<<<<
I'm not sure I follow this. Are you saying that MSVC produces *worse*
code than 4-5 years ago, or are you saying that other compilers have
gotten better and MSVC has stood still? Although adding C++ (to
simple C) obviously makes the optimization process more difficult,
it's hard to believe that MSVC has actually gotten worse.
I ahven't looked in the past year or so, but about two years ago
MSVC was generally better than GCC.
Randy Hyde
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.