Re: Do we need parsers?

David.Monniaux@ens-lyon.fr (David Monniaux)
22 May 1997 21:51:37 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Do we need parsers? john@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za (John Carter) (1997-05-13)
Re: Do we need parsers? thetick@scruz.net (Scott Stanchfield) (1997-05-15)
Re: Do we need parsers? dgay@barnowl.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1997-05-16)
Re: Do we need parsers? monnier+/news/comp/compilers@tequila.cs.yale.edu (Stefan Monnier) (1997-05-17)
Re: Do we need parsers? monnier+/news/comp/compilers@tequila.cs.yale.edu (Stefan Monnier) (1997-05-17)
Re: Do we need parsers? thetick@scruz.net (Scott Stanchfield) (1997-05-19)
Re: Do we need parsers? David.Monniaux@ens-lyon.fr (1997-05-22)
Re: Do we need parsers? john@dwaf-hri.pwv.gov.za (John Carter) (1997-05-22)
Re: Do we need parsers? nkramer@jprc.com (Nick Kramer) (1997-05-30)
Re: Do we need parsers? dgay@barnowl.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1997-06-04)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: David.Monniaux@ens-lyon.fr (David Monniaux)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 May 1997 21:51:37 -0400
Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, France
References: 97-05-158 97-05-202 97-05-225
Keywords: parse, Basic

The whole things smells like GFA Basic, back on the Atari ST, Amiga or PC.
It had nifty features: auto indentation, on-the-fly syntax check and
abbreviation expansion, procedure folding.


Procedure folding is very useful and is only poorly addressed by emacs.


--
http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~dmonniau
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.