Related articles |
---|
Extending javadoc for C/C++ masticol@scr.siemens.com (1997-05-03) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ kelley@Phys.Ocean.Dal.Ca (1997-05-08) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ dwight@pentasoft.com (1997-05-08) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ nr@adder.cs.virginia.edu (Norman Ramsey) (1997-05-08) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ richardm@cogs.susx.ac.uk (1997-05-08) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ objsoft@netcom.com (1997-05-08) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ ercs50@tattoo.ed.ac.uk (1997-05-12) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ amoroso@mclink.it (1997-05-12) |
Re: Extending javadoc for C/C++ r.m.muench@ieee.org (1997-05-13) |
From: | amoroso@mclink.it (Paolo Amoroso) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 12 May 1997 00:31:53 -0400 |
Organization: | Paolo Amoroso - Milan, ITALY |
References: | 97-05-085 |
Keywords: | tools, documentation |
Steve Masticola (masticol@scr.siemens.com) wrote:
: - The best competitor, Don Knuth's "literate programming" and CWEB
: (http://www-cs-faculty.Stanford.EDU/~knuth/books.html) have not taken
: off in widespread practice, for whatever reason.*
kelley@Phys.Ocean.Dal.Ca (Dan Kelley) wrote:
> I agree with the reason given. Knuth's is too complicated.
You might have a look at Norman Ramsey's "noweb":
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~nr/noweb
It's probably the simplest (it has just 5 commands), most versatile
and widely used literate programming tool. It's programming language
independent (i.e. you can write code in any language - or combination
of languages) and supports such formatting languages as TeX, LaTeX and
HTML. As far as I know, noweb is available for most flavors of UNIX,
MS-DOS/Win32 and MacOS.
Those interested in literate programming may have a look at the moderated
group comp.programming.literate. The FAQ is available at:
ftp://ftp.th-darmstadt.de/programming/literate-programming/help/LitProg-FAQ
--
Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@mclink.it>
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.