Funny?

"JUKKA" <jukkaj@ping.at>
13 Apr 1997 21:41:37 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Funny? jukkaj@ping.at (JUKKA) (1997-04-13)
Re: Funny? danwang@atomic.CS.Princeton.EDU (1997-04-16)
Re: Funny? pfoxSPAMOFF@lehman.com (Paul David Fox) (1997-04-16)
Re: Funny? WStreett@shell.monmouth.com.spamguard (1997-04-18)
Re: Funny? will@ccs.neu.edu (William D Clinger) (1997-04-18)
Re: Funny? hrubin@stat.purdue.edu (1997-04-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "JUKKA" <jukkaj@ping.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Apr 1997 21:41:37 -0400
Organization: GOOD
Keywords: optimize, performance, question

I just created a Visual C++ program under Windows 95 which
runs slower when it is optimised for speed. And which runs faster
when it is a debug version without any optimisation and lot of extra
debug code.


This happens when I compare two sets of files in 1kb records in a
loop. Somehow the under laying system is faster when the loop
is slower? Do somebody know why this occurs. The difference is
about 10%. This occurs when most of the files are cashed by the
system.


JOJ
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.