Related articles |
---|
UNCOL in the news again (again) pardo@cs.washington.edu (1997-04-07) |
Re: UNCOL in the news again (again) tgl@netcom.com (1997-04-08) |
Re: UNCOL in the news again (again) mac@coos.dartmouth.edu (1997-04-13) |
From: | tgl@netcom.com (Tom Lane) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Apr 1997 09:38:59 -0400 |
Organization: | Netcom Online Communications Services |
References: | 97-04-053 |
Keywords: | UNCOL |
pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) writes:
> (UVMs). Working with researchers at Taligent, IBM is developing a
> single virtual machine capable of running applications written in C++,
> Smalltalk or Java,
> [I predict they'll all soon be crying "UNCOL" -Pardo]
> [Throw in Lisp and Cobol and you'll really have something. -John]
If their definition of "universal" is "it supports C++ and Java", it's
probably doable. The UNCOL advocates of previous decades had much
more ambitious goals than supporting near-workalike languages...
Throwing in Smalltalk makes the problem at least moderately
interesting, but I bet that requirement will get dumped before long.
regards, tom lane
[Even C++ and Java will be difficult due to the rather different storage
models. Look at TDF/ANDF -- as far as I can tell they ground to a halt
before they'd finished adding C++ to the original C. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.