Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? d.sand@ix.netcom.com (Duane Sand) (1997-03-16) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? harwood@trinidad.progress.com (1997-03-16) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (David L Moore) (1997-03-16) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? preston@tera.com (1997-03-21) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? torbenm@diku.dk (1997-03-21) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? Sergey.Solyanik@bentley.com (Sergey Solyanik) (1997-03-27) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? cdg@nullstone.com (Christopher Glaeser) (1997-03-31) |
Re: Multiplication by a constant - how? preston@cs.rice.edu (1997-04-02) |
From: | Christopher Glaeser <cdg@nullstone.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 31 Mar 1997 15:22:14 -0500 |
Organization: | Nullstone Corporation |
References: | 97-03-062 97-03-092 97-03-114 97-03-150 |
Keywords: | arithmetic, optimize |
Sergey Solyanik wrote:
> By the way, with memoization it really runs very fast - factoring
> all 32K numbers took well under half a minute.
Those are excellent results. There are multiply constants with various
repeating bit sequences in the NULLSTONE suite to detect poor
algorithms, and I measured one compiler that required as much as forty
minutes of compile time for some constants.
Best regards,
Christopher Glaeser cdg@nullstone.com
Nullstone Corporation http://www.nullstone.com
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.