Related articles |
---|
Proper Tail Recursive C++ jerpat@iastate.edu (Jerry) (1997-02-20) |
Re: Proper Tail Recursive C++ hbaker@netcom.com (1997-02-22) |
Re: Proper Tail Recursive C++ will@ccs.neu.edu (William D Clinger) (1997-02-23) |
Re: Proper Tail Recursive C++ njl@cyberpass.net (1997-03-09) |
Re: Proper Tail Recursive C++ hbaker@netcom.com (1997-03-13) |
Re: Proper Tail Recursive Java robison@kai.com (Arch Robison) (1997-03-18) |
From: | Arch Robison <robison@kai.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 18 Mar 1997 13:05:04 -0500 |
Organization: | Kuck & Associates, Inc. |
References: | 97-02-111 97-02-131 97-02-141 97-03-042 97-03-048 |
Keywords: | Java |
>Funny thing is that Java is not stuck with a stack model, yet
>implementations of Java are not required to be tail recursive. When
>will people ever learn? ... :-(
When will the marketplace reward people who learn? Near as I can tell,
the marketplace rewards those who duplicate all bugs of their predecessors
("compatibility"). Java's appropriation of C/C++ syntax (duplication of a bug,
in my opinion) has done more to get it accepted by programmers than any
amount of theoretical goodness could.
Arch D. Robison Kuck & Associates Inc.
robison@kai.com 1906 Fox Drive
217-356-2288 Champaign IL 61820
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.