Re: OO compiler design ?

Trond Ronde <trondro@sn.no>
29 Jan 1997 12:04:18 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
OO compiler design ? jc@chiinc.com (J-C Le Mentec) (1997-01-16)
Re: OO compiler design ? dittmar@berlin.snafu.de (1997-01-17)
Re: OO compiler design ? R.E.Jones@ukc.ac.uk (1997-01-21)
Re: OO compiler design ? steve@gridlock.demon.co.uk (1997-01-22)
Re: OO compiler design ? krotoff@boy.nmd.msu.ru (Alexander Krotoff) (1997-01-22)
Re: OO compiler design ? stephen@lila.york.ac.uk (1997-01-25)
Re: OO compiler design ? trondro@sn.no (Trond Ronde) (1997-01-29)
Re: OO compiler design ? SCHMIDTG@iccgcc.cle.ab.com (1997-02-02)
Re: OO compiler design ? stephen@lila.york.ac.uk (1997-02-07)
Re: OO compiler design ? p.froehlich@link-m.de (1997-02-11)
Re: OO compiler design ? reali@inf.ethz.ch (Patrik Reali) (1997-02-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Trond Ronde <trondro@sn.no>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 29 Jan 1997 12:04:18 -0500
Organization: SN Internett
References: 97-01-136
Keywords: OOP, design, books

J-C Le Mentec wrote:
>
> I am looking for some reference on some work related to the object
> oriented design of an compiler or an interpreter. Somethinh that would
> use a class to implement each individual operator (or function) of the
> language.


Hi! I have a book "Building your own compiler with C++" Author: Jim
Holmes, Prentice Hall. 1995


It's a 200 pages book that uses a very object-oriented way of modeling
a pascal compiler. It's a very good book about this subject. But it
uses Lex and Yacc like everybody else, so if you want to write
everything by yourself, this may not be the best-buy.


Have a nice day
Trond Ronde, Norway.
[This book came up in discussion a few weeks ago, and the comments then
said the use of C++ wasn't very good. Anyone else have an opinion? -John]


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.