Re: visual parse

John Lilley <jlilley@empathy.com>
22 Jan 1997 23:05:18 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
visual parse mcr@visi.com (Michael Roach) (1997-01-16)
Re: visual parse byrd@acm.org (1997-01-16)
Re: visual parse the_artful_parser@null.net (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (1997-01-22)
Re: visual parse jlilley@empathy.com (John Lilley) (1997-01-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: John Lilley <jlilley@empathy.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Jan 1997 23:05:18 -0500
Organization: Nerds for Hire, Inc.
References: 97-01-118 97-01-174
Keywords: parse, tools

Michael Roach said:
> I just started using Visual Parse++ 2.0 by SandStone for Windows


Quinn Tyler Jackson wrote:
> I use, am very happy with it, and would love to chat about it with
> anyone who's also using it.


I know people who use it for small-to-medium languages and are quite
happy with it. I tried it for C++ and found it did not scale well
(the analysis started taking forever). I also found it hard to create
hacks to resolve the truly nasty C++ ambiguities, so I gave up and
used PCCTS.


john lilley
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.