Related articles |
---|
Beginner's Question... mihai@A-aod.resnet.ucsb.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (1997-01-16) |
Fast code vs. fast compile dennis@netcom.com (1997-01-16) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1997-01-19) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1997-01-22) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile jlilley@empathy.com (John Lilley) (1997-01-22) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile mwolfe@dat.cse.ogi.edu (1997-01-22) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile mikey@ontek.com (1997-01-22) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile conway@cs.mu.oz.au (1997-01-22) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1997-01-25) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile wws@renaissance.cray.com (Walter Spector) (1997-01-25) |
Re: Fast code vs. fast compile kanze@gabi-soft.fr (1997-02-16) |
From: | John Lilley <jlilley@empathy.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 Jan 1997 00:03:58 -0500 |
Organization: | Nerds for Hire, Inc. |
References: | 97-01-122 97-01-137 97-01-159 |
Keywords: | performance, practice |
Dennis Yelle <dennis@netcom.com> wrote:
|> As a compiler user, I am (almost) always more concerned about fast
|> code rather than fast compilation.
Daniel J. Salomon wrote:
> Actually the two speeds, compilation versus execution, are sometimes
> related.
Compilation and executation speed are also related as follows: The
less time I spend waiting for the compiler or otherwise wrestling with
unproductive tools (debuggers, doc systems, source code control,
xrefs, etc -- not to say that such tools are necessarily
unproductive), the less time I have available to spend on other
optimizations. A quality compiler produces optimizations of a certain
sort. Other source-code optimization techniques (caching, improving
basic algorithms, reference-counting, rewriting bottlenecks) are
sometimes better.
john lilley
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.