Related articles |
---|
Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? robison@kai.com (Arch Robison) (1997-01-07) |
Re: Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? Laurent.Guerby@enst-bretagne.fr (Laurent Guerby) (1997-01-09) |
Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? rgh@shellus.com (1997-01-09) |
Re: Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? ronald.ten-hove@itron.com (Ron Ten-Hove) (1997-01-12) |
Re: Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1997-01-12) |
Re: Ada vs. C performance, was Possible to write compiler to Java VM? cdg@nullstone.com (Christopher Glaeser) (1997-01-14) |
From: | Christopher Glaeser <cdg@nullstone.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Jan 1997 20:08:03 -0500 |
Organization: | Nullstone Corporation |
References: | 97-01-045 97-01-063 |
Keywords: | optimize, code |
Arch Robison <robison@kai.com> writes:
> ... But I think
> there is a strong reason to suspect that C compilers will generally
> generate better code than Ada compilers. [...]
Laurent Guerby wrote:
> Of course the argument doesn't hold with GNAT since the backend is
> the same for Ada and C.
Using a common back-end does not ensure the same efficiency for two or
more front-ends. Our customers use NULLSTONE to compare the performance
of their C and C++ compilers, because it has proven effective in
isolating mismatches between the front-ends and a common back-end.
Small differences in how the IL is generated can have significant impact
on the generated code, and each front-end/back-end combination must be
tuned for optimal performance.
Best regards,
Christopher Glaeser cdg@nullstone.com
Nullstone Corporation http://www.nullstone.com
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.