Related articles |
---|
Machine code parsers (entropy of machine code) andrey@ix.netcom.com (Andrey I. Savov) (1996-11-24) |
Re: Machine code parsers (entropy of machine code) derek@knosof.co.uk (1996-11-26) |
Re: Machine code parsers (entropy of machine code) andrey@ix.netcom.com (Andrey I. Savov) (1996-12-01) |
Re: Machine code parsers (entropy of machine code) derek@knosof.co.uk (1996-12-03) |
Re: Machine code parsers (entropy of machine code) jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (1996-12-07) |
From: | "Andrey I. Savov" <andrey@ix.netcom.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.compilers.tools.pccts |
Date: | 1 Dec 1996 22:59:31 -0500 |
Organization: | Netcom |
References: | 96-11-147 96-11-155 |
Keywords: | code, theory |
Derek M Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk> wrote
> I think that perhaps we can talk about the entropy of instruction
> sets. But the code egnerated by different compilers?
Actually, the entropy of the instruction sets for Intel/PowerPC was
one of the initial questions. The set of compilers can be fixed saying
that we take only Microsoft compilers into consideration. I don't
believe this matters a lot, though.
> I once did a little experiment. I measured how well gzip compressed
> executable programs for a vareity of machines. There did seem to
> be some correlation between compression ratios for the same programs,
> compiled for different cpu's.
Well, you see, the gzip compression of executable code cannot give you
a good idea about the entropy of the machine code, because gzip
compresses everything as raw data.
As for different CPUs I'd expect RISC code to have smallest entropy
(compresses best).
> Do you think optmised code will have a higher or lower entropy?
It's hard to say, I'd expect higher than non-optimized, because
usually some redundancies are removed during the optimization.
Andrey
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.